Publicado:
Clasificación JEL:
E32, F1, F41, F44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c714/1c7146f0010a2de232845fb43a7d4e582240660d" alt=""
Lo más reciente
Andrea Sofía Otero-Cortés, Karina Acosta, Luis E. Arango, Danilo Aristizábal, Oscar Iván Ávila-Montealegre, Oscar Becerra, Cristina Fernández, Luz Adriana Flórez, Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte, Anderson Grajales, Catalina Granda, Franz Alonso Hamann-Salcedo, Juliana Jaramillo-Echeverri, Carlos Medina, Jesús Enrique Morales-Piñero, Alejandra Morales, Leonardo Fabio Morales, Juan José Ospina-Tejeiro, Christian Manuel Posso-Suárez, José Pulido, Mario Andrés Ramos-Veloza, Alejandro Sarasti-Sierra
John Sebastian Tobar-Cruz, Carlos Alberto Ruiz-Martínez
Ana María Iregui-Bohórquez, Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra, María Teresa Ramírez-Giraldo, Jorge Leonardo Rodríguez-Arenas
Bilateral trade is considered a key driver of business-cycle transmission, as countries with higher bilateral trade have more correlated business cycles. We show, however, that when we account for the common trade exposure of a country pair to similar foreign cycles, the effect of bilateral trade on comovement falls sharply. Furthermore, common trade exposure is also a robust predictor of comovement. We conclude that trade is indeed a driver of business-cycle transmission, but often through common exposure to foreign cycles rather than just bilateral linkages. Finally, we consider the implications of these empirical results for the “trade-comovement puzzle.”