From Catastrophe to Opportunity: Housing Quality Improvements in Rural Colombia During the 2010-2011 Floods

Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana
Number: 
333
Published: 
Authors:
Andrés Mauricio Sánchez-Jabbaa
Classification JEL: 
H84, O18, Q54
Keywords: 
Governmental responses to natural disasters, Housing deficit in rural areas, Impact evaluation

The most recent

Julián Alonso Cárdenas-Cárdenas, Deicy Johana Cristiano-Botia, Eliana Rocío González-Molano, Carlos Alfonso Huertas-Campos
Luis E. Arango, Juan José Ospina-Tejeiro, Fernando Arias-Rodríguez, Oscar Iván Ávila-Montealegre, Jaime Andrés Collazos-Rodríguez, Diana M. Cortázar Gómez, Juan Pablo Cote-Barón, Julio Escobar-Potes, Aarón Levi Garavito-Acosta, Franky Juliano Galeano-Ramírez, Eliana Rocío González-Molano, Maria Camila Gomez Cardona, Anderson Grajales, David Camilo López-Valenzuela, Wilmer Martinez-Rivera, Nicolás Martínez-Cortés, Rocío Clara Alexandra Mora-Quiñones, Sara Naranjo-Saldarriaga, Antonio Orozco, Daniel Parra-Amado, Julián Pérez-Amaya, José Pulido, Karen L. Pulido-Mahecha, Carolina Ramírez-Rodríguez, Sergio Restrepo Ángel, José Vicente Romero-Chamorro, Nicol Valeria Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Norberto Rodríguez-Niño, Diego Hernán Rodríguez-Hernández, Carlos D. Rojas-Martínez, Johana Andrea Sanabria-Domínguez, Diego Vásquez-Escobar
Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte, Adriana Isabel Ortega-Arrieta, Adriana Marcela Rivera-Zárate

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of housing provision in a rural area of a developing country. It examines a government program that delivered prefabricated houses to households whose dwellings were destroyed by flooding caused by the breach of the Canal del Dique in Santa Lucía, Colombia, at the end of 2010. The evaluation combined Difference-in-Differences and Propensity Score Matching methodologies to draw causal inference and mitigate the endogeneity arising from the program’s non-random assignment. Housing conditions were measured with an index that captures the main components affected by the intervention, including construction materials, access to basic sanitation, and energy sources used for cooking. The results indicate that the program reduced pre-existing housing deficits by between 0.21 and 0.37 standard deviations. A descriptive analysis of health-related variables shows that the treatment group reported 43.6 percent fewer medical visits and a 38.5 percent lower incidence of gastrointestinal diseases than the control group, underscoring the potential of post-disaster interventions to improve key aspects of household well-being.