From Catastrophe to Opportunity: Housing Quality Improvements in Rural Colombia During the 2010-2011 Floods

Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana
Number: 
333
Published: 
Authors:
Andrés Mauricio Sánchez-Jabbaa
Classification JEL: 
H84, O18, Q54
Keywords: 
Governmental responses to natural disasters, Housing deficit in rural areas, Impact evaluation

The most recent

María Teresa Ramírez-Giraldo, Karina Acosta, Olga Lucia Acosta Navarro, Lucia Arango-Lozano, Fernando Arias-Rodríguez, Oscar Iván Ávila-Montealegre, Oscar Reinaldo Becerra Camargo, Leonardo Bonilla-Mejía, Grey Yuliet Ceballos-Garcia, Luz Adriana Flórez, Juan Miguel Gallego-Acevedo, Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte, Luis M. García-Pulgarín, Andrés Felipe García-Suaza, Anderson Grajales, Daniela Gualtero-Briceño, Didier Hermida-Giraldo, Ana María Iregui-Bohórquez, Juliana Jaramillo-Echeverri, Karen Laguna-Ballesteros, Francisco Javier Lasso-Valderrama, Daniel Márquez, Carlos Alberto Medina-Durango, Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra, María Fernanda Meneses-González, Juan José Ospina-Tejeiro, Andrea Sofía Otero-Cortés, Daniel Parra-Amado, Juana Piñeros-Ruiz, Christian Manuel Posso-Suárez, Natalia Ramírez-Bustamante, Mario Andrés Ramos-Veloza, Jorge Leonardo Rodríguez-Arenas, Alejandro Sarasti-Sierra, Bibiana Taboada-Arango, Ana María Tribín-Uribe, Juanita Villaveces
Wilmer Martinez-Rivera, Manuel Darío Hernández-Bejarano
Carlos David Ardila-Dueñas, Joel Santiago Castellanos-Caballero, Carlos David Murcia-Bustos

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of housing provision in a rural area of a developing country. It examines a government program that delivered prefabricated houses to households whose dwellings were destroyed by flooding caused by the breach of the Canal del Dique in Santa Lucía, Colombia, at the end of 2010. The evaluation combined Difference-in-Differences and Propensity Score Matching methodologies to draw causal inference and mitigate the endogeneity arising from the program’s non-random assignment. Housing conditions were measured with an index that captures the main components affected by the intervention, including construction materials, access to basic sanitation, and energy sources used for cooking. The results indicate that the program reduced pre-existing housing deficits by between 0.21 and 0.37 standard deviations. A descriptive analysis of health-related variables shows that the treatment group reported 43.6 percent fewer medical visits and a 38.5 percent lower incidence of gastrointestinal diseases than the control group, underscoring the potential of post-disaster interventions to improve key aspects of household well-being.