ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE
Number:
2
Published:
Classification JEL:
E44, F34, F41, G01, H21
Abstract:
Models with an occasionally binding credit constraint are used to study financial crises. We examine the welfare effects of implementing a policy designed for a specific type of constraint when the economy is facing a different one. To this purpose we analyze the implementation of ex ante (macroprudential) versus ex post debt taxes across four possible constraint scenarios (depending on whether creditors assess current or future and total or disposable income of debtors). Our main conclusion is that a debt tax applied only during potentially constrained periods (ex post) is a better policy in three of the four possible cases.
The most recent
Juliana Jaramillo-Echeverri, Karina Acosta, Olga Lucia Acosta Navarro, Oscar Iván Ávila-Montealegre, Jhorland Ayala-García, Jaime Bonet-Morón, Jesus Botero, Luz A. Flórez, Daniela Gallo, Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte, Karelys Guzmán-Finol, Eduardo A. Haddad, Ana María Iregui-Bohórquez, David Camilo López-Valenzuela, Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra, Juan J. Ospina-Tejeiro, Andrea Otero-Cortés, Julian A. Parra-Polania, Gerson Javier Pérez-Valbuena, José Pulido, María Teresa Ramírez-Giraldo, Mario A. Ramos-Veloza, Charles Rahal, Jorge Leonardo Rodríguez-Arenas, Shadia Zardibia
Miguel Felipe Vanegas-Vanegas
Camilo Bohorquez-Penuela, Leonardo Bonilla-Mejía, Anabelle Couleau, Alexánder Almeida
