Global risk transmission to local financial conditions and the participation of foreign investors in Emerging Market Economies’ sovereign bond markets: The case of Colombia

Borradores de Economia
Number: 
1336
Published: 
Authors:
Oscar Botero-Ramíreza,
Classification JEL: 
E44, E52, F30, F32, F34, F31, F38, G12, G15, G18
Keywords: 
Sovereign bond markets, Foreign investors, Benchmark-driven investors, Global risk transmission, Financial conditions, Original sin
Abstract: 

Foreign investor participation in Colombia’s domestic sovereign bond market surged after 2014, lowering yields, and supporting local-currency debt issuance and local market liquidity. However, it also increased the market’s sensitivity to global financial shocks. Empirical analysis suggests that during periods of high foreign participation in the local sovereign debt market (2014–2022), global risk factors had a stronger impact on domestic financial conditions, while the recent decline in foreign participation since 2023 has somewhat reduced this sensitivity. The Central Bank’s flexible inflation-targeting regime, supported by a fully flexible exchange rate regime and robust external buffers, has helped manage these risks, as demonstrated during the Covid-19 pandemic. The evolving composition of foreign investors remains a key channel for the transmission of global shocks to Colombia’s financial conditions.

The most recent

Juliana Jaramillo-Echeverri, Adriana Sofía Rodríguez
Gaurav Khanna, Carlos Alberto Medina-Durango, Anant Nyshadham, Daniel Ramos-Menchelli, Jorge Andrés Tamayo-Castaño, Audrey Tiew

Approach

This paper analyzes how the participation of foreign investors in Colombia’s local sovereign debt market became, particularly after 2014, a key channel for transmitting global financial risk to domestic financial conditions. It describes episodes of capital inflows and outflows following Colombia’s increased weight in the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Index, the effects of higher foreign participation on yields, liquidity, and debt structure, and the role of investor composition in amplifying external shocks. In addition, the study uses the IDOAM Index developed by Banco de la República (the Central Bank of Colombia) and a VAR model estimated by subperiods to assess how the sensitivity of domestic financial conditions to global factors has changed between 2011 and 2025.

Contribution

The paper synthesizes existing empirical evidence on the effects of foreign participation in emerging markets and presents specific results for Colombia, showing that the entry of investors after 2014 lowered yields, broadened the investor base in local currency, and improved liquidity, but also increased the country’s exposure to changes in global financial conditions. Furthermore, it highlights that the effects depend on investor composition: mutual funds and index-driven agents react strongly to global factors, whereas long-term institutional investors respond mainly to domestic fundamentals. The analysis using the IDOAM Index and the VAR model contributes to understanding how this sensitivity varies according to the level of foreign participation.

Evidence shows that the transmission of global shocks to domestic financial conditions was significantly stronger during the period of high foreign participation (2014–2022) and weakened after 2023 as foreign holdings declined. 

Results

The findings show that during 2014–2022, a period of high foreign participation, global shocks had a rapid and significant impact on domestic financial conditions, as evidenced by the response of the IDOAM Index to increases in the global risk indicator. Before 2014, when foreign participation was low, the transmission of these shocks was practically negligible, whereas after 2022, with the reduction in foreign holdings, sensitivity declined but remains relevant. The VAR model applied to 10-year TES yields confirms that global shocks raise financing costs across all periods, with differences in magnitude and speed depending on the level of foreign participation and fiscal conditions. These results are complemented by previous evidence linking foreign participation to effects on credit, volatility, and the structure of the local market.