Borradores de Economía - Debt taxes during crises, a blessing in disguise?

Number: 
1270
Published: 
Classification JEL: 
E32, E44, F34, F38, F41, G01
Keywords: 
Macroprudential policies, ex post policies, debt tax, financial constraint, Financial crisis, sudden stop

The most recent

Andrea Sofía Otero-Cortés, Karina Acosta, Luis E. Arango, Danilo Aristizábal, Oscar Iván Ávila-Montealegre, Oscar Becerra, Cristina Fernández, Luz Adriana Flórez, Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte, Anderson Grajales, Catalina Granda, Franz Alonso Hamann-Salcedo, Juliana Jaramillo-Echeverri, Carlos Medina, Jesús Enrique Morales-Piñero, Alejandra Morales, Leonardo Fabio Morales, Juan José Ospina-Tejeiro, Christian Manuel Posso-Suárez, José Pulido, Mario Andrés Ramos-Veloza, Alejandro Sarasti-Sierra
Ana María Iregui-Bohórquez, Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra, María Teresa Ramírez-Giraldo, Jorge Leonardo Rodríguez-Arenas

Abstract

Models with an occasionally binding credit constraint have been used to analyze financial crises and previous literature has highlighted that the specific form of this constraint is decisive for policymaking conclusions. What are the welfare effects of implementing a policy that is appropriate for a specific type of constraint when the economy is actually facing a different one? We provide an answer by analyzing the implementation either of ex ante (or macroprudential) vs. ex post debt taxes in four possible collateral constraint cases (depending on whether creditors assess current or future and total or disposable income of debtors). Our main conclusion is that a debt tax applied only during potentially constrained periods (i.e., ex post) is a more favorable intervention if the policymaker does not know which credit constraint is facing or if it is more likely to be facing a disposable-income constraint (either for current or future income).